Monday, March 2, 2009

References for Master Project

Here are list of journal that I read to finish my study. All the references are not like in the thesis way, but this important for me because this way of writing will help me to choose which one of them to put in references on my hardcopy thesis. All citation in this blog should be refer to this references :-

[00]G. Di Giuseppe, M. Atature, M. Shaw, A. V. Sergienko, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich "Entangled-Photon Generation from Parametric Down-Conversion in Media with Inhomogeneous Nonlinearity", Physical Review A, v. 66, 013801 (2002).

[12] M. Atature, G. Di Giuseppe, M. Shaw, A. V. Sergienko, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich "Multiparameter Entanglement in Femtosecond Parametric Down Conversion", Physical Review A, v.65, 023808 (2002).

[A0]R. P. Wang and H. R. Zhang "Theory for Quantum State of Photon Pairs Generated from Spontaneous Parametric down-Conversion Nonlinear Process", Optics and Spectroscopy, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 148–152 (2007).

[A1]A Einstein, B Podolsky, N Rosen "Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete", Physical Review, v.47, pp. 777-780 (1935).

[A2]M. H. Rubin, D. N. Klyshko, Y. H. Shih, and A. V. Sergienko, "Theory of two-photon entanglement in type-II optical parametric down-conversion", Physical Review A, v.50, pp. 5122-5133 (1994).

[A2][28][8][17a] Roy. J. Glauber, "The Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence", Phys. Rev. 130, 2529 - 2539 (1963).

[A2][28][8][17b] Roy. J. Glauber, "Coherent and Incoherent States of Radiation Field", Phys. Rev. 131, 2766(1963).

[A5] P. G. Kwiat, K. Mattle, H. Weintfurter, A. Zeilinger, A. V. Sergienko, and Y. H. Shih "New High Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs": Physical Review Letters, v.75, p.4337 (1995).

[B0]Anthony N. Vamivakas, Bahaa E. A. Saleh,* Alexander V. Sergienko, and Malvin C. Teich, "Theory of spontaneous parametric down-conversion from photonic crystals", Physical Review A 70, 043810 (2004).

[B1]Martin M. Fejer, G. A. Magel, Dieter H.Jundt, and Robert L. Byer, Fellow, IEEE "Quasi-Phase-Matched Second Harmonic Generation:Tuning and Tolerances", IEEE Journal Of Quantum Electronics, v. 28, pp. 2631-2654 (1992)

[B6] M. C. Booth, M. Atature, G. Di Giuseppe, B. E. A. Saleh, A. V. Sergienko, and M. C. Teich "Counterpropagating Entangled Photons From a Waveguide with Periodic Nonlinearity", Physical Review A, v. 66, 023815 (2002).

[D0] Sergey A. Podoshvedov, Jaewoo Noh*, and Kisik Kim "A Full Quantum Theory of Parametric Down Conversion and Its Application to Coincidence Measurements", Journal of the Korean Physical Society, v.47, No.2, August 2005, pp. 213~222

[D03] Z. Y. Ou and L. Mandel. Violation of Bell’s inequality and classical probability in a two-photon correlation experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61(1988)

[D10]M. Olsen, R. Horowicz, L. Plimak, N. Treps, C. Fabre, "Quantum noise induced macroscopic revivals in second harmonic generation", Phys. Rev A Rapid communications, 61, 021803 (2000)


[D13]A. I. Lvovsky *, H. Hansen, T. Aichele, O. Benson, J. Mlynek †, and S. Schiller "Quantum state reconstruction of the single-photon Fock state", Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 050402 (2001)

[D14]Jaewoo Noh Frequency Spectrum of a Photon Wave Packet Generated from a Pulsed Optical Parametric Oscillator JKPS 2004 44:271.

My Blog Still in "Tunggang Tebalik"

Currently I'm new in blogging. So there are lot of thing I need to learn to make sure my blog is good. Overall in this blog, it's all about my master degree, so beside focusing on my master degree, I still need to look up on painting my blog so thats its not like right now, so "tunggang tebalik". I hope I get time to learn this simple thing sooner or later, but I promise before ending my master, my blog for this degree wouldn't look like this at the end of it wahahaha

Monthly Progress I Think =.=

Although the title is monthly progress but the real thing is, it my 1st progress report to my co-supervisor :p , my supervisor always updated with my current progress because his office just next to my room :lol: 

Ok here are my report for this monthly progress(should be 2nd)

====================================================================Objective of Studies


  1. To conduct the theoretical mod

    elling of the quantum field interaction of light with nonlinear optical crystal.


  2. To carry out the numerical modelling of the spontaneous parametric down-conversion process to generate entangled photon pair.


Entangled States


Entangled states or Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) states is a states such that measurement of an observable of either particle determines the value of the obervable for the other particle. Meaning that, there are correlation(or anti correlation) between both particle(idler and signal). Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion(SPDC) is one of the tool to generate this kind of states.[a2]




This decay process obeys (phase matching laws) to energy conservation and momentum conservation[c6]



The down-conversion is said to be of type I or type II[a2]


About Nonlinear Crystal


In this project we will use β-BARIUM BORATE (BBO) crystal as the nonlinear crystal. There are two types of Nonlinear crystal which is uniaxial and biaxial nonlinear crystal. BBO is uniaxial type.

Type indices of refraction for uniaxial crytal :-

  1. ordinary (o)


  2. extraordinary (e)

*for negatif uniaxial crystal, the ordinary ray travels slower than extraordinary ray


The orientation of BBO crystal will lead to what type of phase matching the photon will have[c6]


Phase Matching


Phase matching can be achieve if the frequency and momentum of photons agree with the equation above. Combination between ordinary and extraordinary ray will the determines the type of SPDC can have.[c6]

(a) type I SPDC; (b)collinear type II SPDC; (c)non collinear type II SPDC


Condition for type I is

kpump(o) = ksignal(e) +kidler(e).

The signal and idler have parallel polarization

Condition for type II is

kpump(o) =ksignal(o) +kidler(e) ,


kpump(o) =ksignal(e) +kidler(o)

The signal and idler photon have orthogonal polarization. If photon pair come out from crystal were same direction with the photon from pump, the process is collinear type II SPDC and if photon pair come out in different direction with the photon pump, the process known as non collinear type II SPDC. The photon pair from non collinear type II SPDC is much easier to differentiate between the idler and signal photon.[c6]

Simple Configuration of SPDC experiment






A birefringent crystal converts the pump beam into a pair of collinear down-conversion beams. BS is a polarization dependent beam splitter which transmits the o ray and reflects the e ray. D1 and D2 are photodectors and C is the coincidence counter.[a2]

Program for Calculating Non-Colinear Phase Matching

(http://physics.nist.gov/Divisions/Div844/facilities/cprad/PMProgram.html)

Briefly this computational techniques being build so that it can provide preliminary answers to a variety of questions that must be asked about a particular down-conversion source before it is constructed in the laboratory, such as "Over what range of wavelengths is down-conversion possible? What should the 'cut' of the crystal's optical axis be? At what angles can we expect to find certain wavelengths emitted from the crystal?" and so on. The method presented on[c6](documentation of NIST Phasematch Program) can calculate both collinear and non-collinear phase matching that allows experimental configuration including uniaxial or biaxial crystal to be modeled in detail.


There are several research work on this source code. One of it is thesis by Dustin Shipp. From his research using the the fotran source code from NIST(freely distributed) on Non Collinear Parametric Down Conversion, he compared the down-conversion ring from the program and the experimental result and both of it agree of predicting the location of the down-conversion ring with only 0.2 degree of error on the program.[d0]

Kyle J. Arnold working by using the numerical data produced by NIST Phasematch Program, he making a model of a downconversion source in ASAP( Breult Inc.)[c0]

List Of Problem

  1. The NIST Phase Matching program not a dynamic model of spdc process. It is much more on mathematical model.

  2. The program no stated on how to determine the pair photon we get were entangle(only on how to produce pair photon of SPDC source).

Recommendation of Sotware

Kyle J. Arnold have prove that he can get the down conversion source in ASAP using numerical data produced by NIST Phasematch program. Below is ASAP features :

  1. Model optical and mechanical system components

  2. Model imaging systems, illumination systems, and light-concentrating devices

  3. Model visible, ultraviolet, and infrared radiation in optical systems

  4. Model radiometry of complex systems, including radiance

  5. Model surface (BRDF) and volume scatter (pre-defined or custom)

  6. Build system models requiring large numbers of objects and sources

  7. Render system geometry, raytraces, and light sources

  8. Perform numerical and graphical CIE/Chromaticity analyses

  9. Optimize optical systems with the ASAP Optimization interface

  10. Tolerance optical systems in the ASAP Builder interface or scripts

  11. Import measured source data such as Radiant Sources™

  12. Use the SolidWorks Parts Only 3D Modeling Engine (license included)

  13. Write ASAP-specific GTX files from within SolidWorks

  14. Assign object and layer names in SolidWorks

  15. Write ASAP-specific IGES files from within Rhinoceros®

  16. Import/Export IGES files using the ASAP smartIGES translator

  17. Import geometry and optical properties using the XML file format

  18. Integrate scripts in Python, VBscript, Jscript, and other languages

  19. Use pre-defined LED, CCFL, incandescent, and arc sources

  20. Drag-and-drop sources, lenses, glasses, scatter models, and coatings

  21. Begin your simulation with one of 600+ example files

  22. Use distributed processing to spawn up to 5 ASAP sessions on networked computers

  23. Create your own custom workspace within ASAP

===================================================================

after 1 1/2 hours we end the session and we conclude that, our next job should focus on [c6] and maybe we will convert the fotran source code on [c6] to become C code. Hopefully we can model this SPDC.

But still in question is that how we want to show that the spdc source we get from mathematical model that propose by [c6] were entangled???



Monday, January 5, 2009

Books


http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?ww2rlqnwmm0

(pict from http://www.arabswell.com)


http://www.mediafire.com/?n2utgyxzwr2

(pict from sciencedirect.com)





http://www.mediafire.com/?tkiq4zwmtlm

(pict from www.cambridge.org)










Entanglement and Decoherence
http://www.mediafire.com/?axzzln5yybt

(pict from springer.com)







http://www.mediafire.com/?vntdmtmmxui

(pict from amazon.com)

Master Degree Started 2 weeks already!!!

Currently i'm master student in UTM and doing my research on "Numerical modelling of SPDC process to produce photon entanglement". When i get this title from my supervisor, its quite interesting although I still blur about it :p, but hopefully I can generate this SPDC process numericlly and get my master degree in 1 1/2 year or 2 years maybe :D